|
Project
#26
Together
Against All Odds: Learning from Portraits of Teachers of "At
Risk" Students
October
1997
By:
Sandra Finney, David Friesen, Caroline Krentz, Sandra Garratt, Brenda
Martin, Terri Mayne and Dianne Stark
Chapter
1
Historical
Overview: Developing Supports for the Teaching of Students at Risk
- Caroline Krentz
In
the 1995-96 school year, three university-based researchers - Sandra
Finney, David Friesen and Caroline Krentz - submitted a proposal
to the Dr. Stirling McDowell Foundation for Research into Teaching.
Our impetus for the research study came from our experiences working
with preservice and inservice teachers of at risk students in the
schools in and around Regina. We recognized the need that both experienced
and beginning teachers had for realistic, grounded, and successful
ways to respond to the needs of at risk students. At the same time,
we wanted to ensure that the positive practices were seen within
the full complexity of classroom life today, in ways that valued
students' potential to learn. Two purposes guided the initial development
of the research:
- To
provide teachers with case studies of good teaching practice related
to at risk students.
- To
initiate a network of teachers.
More
specific objectives emerged in our discussions. These included:
- To
work collaboratively and supportively with a group of teachers
who believe in the potential of at risk students and in the exploration
of responsive teaching practices and classroom environments.
- To
develop case studies which illuminate the elements and qualities
of classroom life and teaching practices, which are supportive
of the teaching of at risk students.
In
the fall of 1996 we began to put our plan into action. Over the
next school year we organized after-school and half-day meetings
with teachers. We held introductory meetings on two different days
and times - one after school and the other in the early evening
- to accommodate teachers' busy schedules. Over the year it became
clear that after-school meetings were the most convenient for the
network that emerged. Six, after-school meetings allowed us time
to plan the research, establish a network, and share stories of
effective practice. When we wanted to discuss issues relating to
teaching practice, half-day sessions were scheduled. Two, half-day
sessions incorporated story telling to invite in-depth discussions
of two central themes which had emerged during the first after-school
session. These themes were (a) the meaning of being a teacher of
large numbers of at risk students, and (b) the complexities of developing
effective teaching practices in this context. Members of the network
were so struck by the power of the stories to illuminate both themes
that they decided to explore ways to present the material to other
teachers of at risk students. The university-based researchers'
initial idea of working with three to six teachers to produce case
studies was replaced by the teacher researchers' idea of developing
a book containing teachers' stories, accompanied by reflective discussions
of the stories. The following chart describes the meeting schedule
and the gradual shift of focus as a core of teachers shared their
vision with the network.
|
Meeting
Date
|
Purpose/Activity
|
Attendance
|
| October
15, 1996 4:00 pm |
Introduce
research |
20 |
| October
17, 1996 7:30 pm |
- Generate
ideas
- Begin
network
|
6 |
| November
12, 1996 4:00 pm |
- Share
stories
- Clarify
purpose of research
- Respond
to teachers' ideas
- Recognize
shift in focus of research
- Plan
presentation for Learning from Practice
|
13 |
| December
11, 1996 4:00 pm |
- Discuss
Success Stories
- Review
ethics agreement
- Plan
half-day session
|
6 |
| January
21, 1997 4:00 pm |
- Discuss
half-day session
- Introduce
idea of teacher
- Proposal
for McDowell fund
- Continue
sharing of stories
|
11 |
| February
13, 1997 12-4:00 pm |
- Present
A Day in the Life of a Teacher
- (Tape
and transcribe session discussions)
|
11 |
| March
4, 1997 4:00 pm |
- Discuss
proposal
- Brainstorm
ideas for stories
- Document
- Plan
half-day session
|
6 |
| April
24, 1997 1-4:00 pm |
- Continue
story telling
- (Tape
and transcribe session)
|
9 |
| May
13, 1997 4:00 pm |
- Celebrate
proposal success
- Plan
for next school year
- Reflect
on network activities
|
5 |
The
network's focus gradually emerged over the course of the year. Participants
helped shape the nature of the research and the flow of the discussions.
Most successful were the half-day sessions when school-based researchers
had time to explore the issues related to successful practice in
the teaching of at risk students. University-based researchers became
the facilitators in discussions and also assumed responsibility
for documentation of the events and processes that had occurred
during the network's first year. As a result of the nine meetings,
which were attended by an average of 9 school-based researchers,
a network of about 10 researchers is committed to continuing the
research into the next school year.
Chapter
2
Research
Design
David
Friesen
The
title of the original research submission, Realizing Educational
Potential through Collaboration: Case Studies on Inner-City Classrooms,
implied that case study methodology would be employed. That certainly
was the intention of the university-based researchers. However,
in the process of building trust through dialogue with the teachers,
a different methodology emerged.
At
the project proposal stage we had a clear view of what we wanted
to accomplish: realistic, concrete, accurate, positive, and successful
ways for experienced and beginning teachers to respond to at risk
students' needs. Such practices had to be seen within the full complexity
of classroom life. To reduce this complexity to oversimplified,
technical formulas has, in the past, led to feelings of failure
and further cynicism on the part of teachers in relation to the
relevance and trustworthiness of educational research. Therefore,
to focus on those who are, in many ways, the neediest among our
students, we realized that our present educational research had
to recognize and respond to these interrelated challenges.
We
decided that to unearth the wealth of responsive and supportive
practices buried in classrooms that are not often the focus of positive
research, we needed to work collaboratively and supportively with
a small group of teachers who believed in the potential of at risk
students. In the process, we hoped we could eventually observe in
their classrooms and write case studies that could be useful to
other teachers of at risk students.
As
described in the historical overview, we established a support network
of about 20 teachers for the teaching of at risk students. Rather
than developing case studies based on specific classroom practices,
the methodology that emerged involved extensive dialogue within
the network that eventually produced narratives of classroom life.
Also, the methodology involved interpretation and analysis to illuminate
common challenges and best practices. One of the results of this
research process was the development of this document, jointly written
by the university-based researchers and the teachers.
Throughout
this study, ethics - as it relates to this kind of research - surpassed
the usual assurances of anonymity and confidentiality. As university-based
researchers, we realized an obligation to facilitate the ownership
of this project to the teachers. The whole exercise has been far
more than simply acquiring good data. It has been a search for ways
to work with teachers to benefit at risk students. In the process
of acknowledging our obligation, we discovered that the case study
approach simply did not fit the needs of this group of teachers.
To the university-based researchers in this project, dialogue and
narratives, interpretation, analysis, and the production of this
document appeared to be the correct ethical response.
Conversation,
narrative and interpretation have become prevalent in qualitative
research. Carson (1986) suggests that conversation, as opposed to
structured interviews, is a meaning-making activity. It is the way
that educative communities are created (Friesen, 1996). The dialogue
that occurred in the after-school meetings created a community based
on trust and openness between teachers and university researchers.
The original agenda of the university-based researchers had to be
set aside to favor the group agenda that had developed over time.
The story method is increasingly being used because researchers
realize that teachers make sense out of their teaching experiences
by telling stories (Gudmundsdottir, 1991). Stories capture the complexity
of teaching practice in a holistic way (Bruner, 1986; Polkinghorne,
1988). Conversations with teachers of at risk students generated
stories that provided insight into their lives. Also, the two-way
flow of ideas from these conversations ensured equality of position
between the university-based researchers and the teachers involved
(Florio-Ruane, 1991).
According
to Gadamer (1988), the continental philosopher, interpretation
is not just another human activity, but "the basic structure
of our experience of life" (p. 58). Interpretation is the way
we are in the world. Dialogue is essential to any form of partnership
because the interpretive process leads to a common base of understanding.
Our interpretation of the teachers' stories was a necessary element
of the research design because it gave us new understandings of
their practice and heightened teachers' understandings as well.
This
project has largely been a dialogical and interpretative research
process that has involved forming relationships with the teachers
and the negotiation of meanings. The contingency of at risk teaching
practice demands continual interpretation for new meanings to emerge;
therefore, university-based researchers must be immersed in the
stories of teachers. Extended dialogue among participants is necessary
to come to a common understanding of what makes for good teaching
in an at risk environment.
To
summarize, our research has evolved from a university initiative
to a mutual, trusting collaboration; from a case study methodology
to narrative-based research.
Chapter
3
"A
Day in the Life": Stories of the Daily Realities of Teachers
with Large Numbers of Students Who are At Risk
Sandra
Finney
Introduction
For
one year, the editors of this monograph have participated in a network
for the support of teachers with large numbers of students who are
"at risk" because of complex social and economic barriers.
What have we, as university-based researchers, learned from our
first year in the network? Perhaps, because our discussions were
so rich and covered so much ground, it would be most fair to say
that we have learned a lot about the sheer complexity of the lives
of such teachers. This monograph is about that complexity and what
it means to the teachers themselves. As well, our monograph represents
a beginning point in helping others understand the implications
of this complexity. It is based on the assumption that understanding
is the necessary foundation for helpful, supportive actions.
The
focus selected for this monograph is the daily school life of teachers
of at risk students. Teachers in the network called the story telling
around this focus, "A Day in the Life". They felt that
by having each teacher member of the network choose one school day,
record the events of that day - from beginning to end - and then
share their day with the group, a number of positive results might
accrue. Their sense for the importance of this process was sound.
Throughout
the afternoon spent sharing the stories and discussing the commonalties
within them, a large number of positive benefits were noted by the
teachers. Foremost among these was the notion, "I am not alone.
My experiences are not unique or 'weird' and I have not lost a grip
on my teaching reality. Others experience these same things which
I experience and are faced with the same sorts of compromises and
pressures I face."
A
second positive affect was teachers' renewed recognition of their
own abilities to survive and grow personally and professionally
within such difficult contexts. Their identities as competent and
caring teachers appeared to be strengthened through participating
in this process. It seemed, then, to be a valid and useful focus
for our monograph - one in which we too could play a role by adding
our own interpretations of the meaning of the "A Day in the
Life" stories.
As
has been discussed in the introductory chapter, our interpretations
of the teachers' stories is only one aspect of a larger interpretive
process. What follows in the remainder of this monograph are two
stories chosen from the set of "A Day in the Life" stories
developed by teachers in the network and two sets of interpretations
of these stories.
First,
we have our own responses to the stories. Then, we also include
the responses of four teachers in the network who took the stories
and our interpretations of them and developed responses to both.
In this monograph, through bringing together the responses of what
might be called both "outsiders" and "insiders",
we hoped to better capture the richness and depth of meaning which
the stories contained. While the "A Day in the Life" stories
are true, their authors remain anonymous to protect the identities
of the students and others in the school communities which they
describe. Pseudonyms are used for the teachers and for all other
persons in the stories.
The
Many Roles and Relationships of Teaching: Mary's Story
My
day began at 7:30 this morning with my arrival at school. I just
about put my boots on the boot rack but remembered that boots have
been disappearing lately, so I took them to my classroom instead.
I arrived so early this morning because my preinterns were coming
and I wanted to make sure that everything was organized for them.
After I spent about 30 minutes straightening my desk and trying
to get my head around the things that needed to be done today, I
went to talk with my principal about the referrals I have on a couple
of kids. Brian was waiting in the hall already, so I gave him a
couple of jobs to do in the classroom so he wasn't just hanging
around. He was happy to have something to do and not to have to
wait outside in the cold.
On
the way to Mike's (the principal) office, I ran into Judy (Grade
6/7 teacher). We discussed the upcoming dance. Students are very
apathetic about it. We think we only have 30% of the three classes
coming, so we consider canceling it. Our conversation moves to the
preinterns - Judy has two students as well. One of the ways that
we hoped to involve them was through the alternate programs we are
using. We discuss how we will timetable the students' time for the
day. Then, we decided we better talk to Mike about the dance.
We
discussed the dance with Mike, then discussed placements in the
Structured Learning Classroom (SLC), possibly for a student in Judy's
room and also in mine. We went on to discuss an appropriate course
of action for these two students.
I
returned to my room to discover three more kids in "helping"
Brian. I guess it's too cold and they aren't dressed properly for
it.
My
preinterns arrived and we sat down and discussed our upcoming lessons
for the day. I explained about Jason who is on a half-day, in-school
timeout. He probably should be on an out-of-school timeout, but
he would be by himself at home and would end up roaming the neighborhood.
So it's probably better to have him at school under some supervision.
We discussed Andrew who has decided to go to Cochrane. While he
has settled on the decision, he's still quite upset about it. He's
not consciously upset, but his behavior has been quite inappropriate
since making the decision. We discussed Ryan, who has actually had
quite a good week. However, he may be upset by the change today
and who knows what will happen. We discussed James and the fact
that he started Ritalin a week ago. I explained that it has made
minute changes in his behavior but his parents have to really get
a handle on what's happening at home.
After
explaining the situations regarding these students, we discussed
the students' possible reactions to the preinterns and how the preinterns
would cope with the various scenarios. One can never tell how my
class will react to a change in routine. With two additional people,
and possibly their supervisor, it is difficult to gauge all the
possible reactions. The key is to be prepared for whatever happens.
After
our discussion, I got the morning's work ready for Jason's arrival.
The bell rang and I escorted Jason to his room while the preinterns
stayed with the class. I was really pleased when I returned to find
my entire class sitting and working quietly. They seemed
to be handling the presence of the preinterns alright
at least
for the first five minutes. I'm not sure whether they are still
asleep or whether they are too cold!
We
completed the grammar and Skills for School Success lessons
with the entire class paying attention and working diligently. I
was quite proud of them. The math lesson that the preinterns had
planned was a little too esoteric for my class. They were very unruly,
forcing me to step in to regain control. As well, the lesson was
not structured enough with predictable steps. As a result, he students
were overwhelmed by the concept. I will have to reteach the material.
I
had intended to spend recess talking with my preinterns. However,
I had to check on Jason. While I was there, the girls who run the
weekly fluoride treatment needed help. So I assisted them. Then
Mike and Judy, who were talking in the hallway regarding the dance
and our two SLC placements, needed my input. So much for recess.
After
recess, five of my students went to Decode C reading class.
My preinterns accompanied them. So the rest of the morning was relatively
calm.
Just
before lunch, James blew up. I had to remove him to the hallway
twice. He just would not settle down. He felt he had been falsely
accused of talking and acting up in class. When the lunch bell rang,
James stomped out of the room to the lunchroom.
When
I arrived in the staff room, there was a note on my mailbox to call
Allan's mom. Allan has been away for the past five days. I suspect
he's been babysitting but mom's covering for him. I was unable to
phone her right then because our Parent Advisory Council ordered
us pizza for lunch. At 12:15, I met with Mike and the girls' basketball
coach to discuss our plan for practice. That took until 12:30 when
noon-hour supervision began.
The
kids really want to go outside. Hopefully by this afternoon the
windchill will have moderated enough for us to let them go out.
Their behavior deteriorates the longer they are cooped up. Having
had two indoor sessions this morning, needless to say, they are
getting a little "stir crazy".
It's
12:35 and James is still angry at the world. He is uncommunicative
and anything he does say is very negative. I'm considering sending
him home if this doesn't improve. I spoke to Mike about it and he
said I should use my discretion. I think I'll let James sit and
hopefully he'll cool down on his own.
The
12:45 bell rang. James has cooled down enough to come back. I hope
he lasts the afternoon. We begin with
Morphographic
Spelling. Because it is so structured, it's a good way to begin
with this afternoon and, considering the volatility of my kids today,
they will need all the structure they can get. Initially, they don't
participate very well. However, by the end they are doing great.
They move to French, my prep time. Mike teacher the French class.
We decided at the beginning of the year that this would be the best
option.
This
afternoon we decide that Mike will take one group and I will keep
the other. The kids that are with me are very excited because I
have promised them that we will study together for the French test
tomorrow. We spend an hour reviewing and every kid has at least
an 80% knowledge of the material. They are very excited about this
and proud of the fact that they have done so well. They say that
they wish they could write the test right now. I hope that they
do spend a few minutes reviewing tonight because chances are, with
their short-term memory being as weak as it is, they won't retain
it for tomorrow.
Mike's
group comes back and settles in fairly well. Because they have had
quite a good day, I say that they can have free work time until
recess. We review the parameters and they start working. I can see
that they are more unsettled than they were in the morning and that
I'll have to do some rethinking of the period after recess if I'm
going to get any productive work out of them.
The
recess bell rings. It has wormed up enough to go outside. Holy cow!
The kids are nuts! I break up five fights and have six kids spread
around the playground in neutral corners cooling off. There are
at least another 10 who, if I turn my back, will be into fist fights
as well.
After
recess we settle into a discussion of how to write a hypothesis
for our science fair reports. The kids are not cooperating. They're
tired and don't feel like working anymore. We get through the bare
minimum and I give the kids the remainder of the period to type
their reports, write their hypotheses, or do other research. Most
handle it quite well. Ryan, Andrew, Colin, and Connor are really
struggling to stay on task. I decide I can live with a little chatter
as long as it doesn't disrupt the entire class.
The
computers were not working properly
..we couldn't find enough
disks
..the printer was in use; however
..the kids handled
all these hurdles very well. And so ended my day. Except for basketball
practice which lasted until 5:15. Oh yes!
and a Parent Advisory
Council meeting which ran from 7:00 until 9:30. That was an hour
and a half ago. Now I'm at home wrapping up my homework.
My
kids never cease to amaze me. On days like today, when there was
a multitude of things going on, they could have been absolutely
wild. But, considering the day we had, they were excellent. Tomorrow
will be virtually a normal day. But who can predict their reactions?
I guess the key is to meet them where they are and do what you can
to take them beyond. Never a dull moment in a high-risk classroom.
"A
Day in the Life" of an Elementary School Teacher: Anna's Story
6:30
am - Time to rise and shine. During my shower, I am wondering if
my missing student will return to school this morning. I hardly
know her because, although she has been in my room for two weeks,
she has been absent five out of ten days. The child was mad at her
mom because mom said she was going out to get some food and didn't
come home. Must remember to check with our community coordinator
and see if she has been able to find anything out.
8:30
am - Make sure the coffee is being made. Check with Pam, the community
coordinator. No sign of my missing student. The police have gone
with the landlord to investigate. They say there is not much left
in the house, but Pam says there wasn't a lot in the house when
she was out there before. Pam thinks the family has gone back to
the reserve because they haven't shown up at Albert School.
8:45
am - Have coffee in the staff room. Catch up on the weekend news.
9:00
am - Take attendance - wow - everyone is on time - only three absent.
Kids color in squares to record their points for being present and
being on time. Get the kids to put their books for the book sale
for Project Love on the back shelf. Introduce the spelling lesson.
Shawn can't find his pencil - he is sure someone has stolen it
..finds
it on his desk. Continue with the lesson. Bobby has misplaced his
book while Shawn was looking for his pencil. I tell Bobby he'll
have to wait and look for the book after the lesson. Everyone starts
to work, even Bobby who has found his book somewhere. Kids come
to the door to explain their class's Project Love fund raiser. Send
students out into the hall in pairs to read to the parent volunteer.
James continues to make strange noises and is asked to take a timeout
in the hall. He is allowed to come back in after he says he is sure
he can work quietly now. Time to move onto social studies. We discuss
Saskatchewan symbols. Another pair of students at the door to explain
their project.
10:30
am - Recess has arrived. Shawn can't find his boots. I remind him
where to look. Ah ha! There they are - on the boot rack!! There
is a call from the office to go to the staff room to celebrate Sylvia's
Birthday. The angel food cake was delicious. There are doughnuts
from the Board to mark Teacher Appreciation Week. Have to chase
the ants that the exterminator, who came on Friday, hasn't got rid
of.
10:45
am - Standing in the hall, waiting for the kids to come in. James
has an ugly face on. I ask him to stand by me and tell me what the
problem is. He tells me that Charlie spit oats in his face. I tell
him we will discuss this when we get in the classroom. The playground
supervisor tells me that Charlie has had problems on the playground
and perhaps we could discuss it during lunch. Ask Charlie to walk
with me to the room. Bobby goes by with a bruised and cut cheek.
Tim, our assistant, is fuming because Charlie hit him with a snowball.
After
we arrive in the classroom, everyone is told to continue with social
studies while I deal with the playground problems. After an extremely
long and convoluted story, Charlie admits that he threw his handcuffs
at Bobby thereby causing the bruised and bloody cheek. I confiscate
the handcuffs and tell the boys they have each lost 50 points for
fighting. Tim came along and Charlie apologized for hitting him
with the snowball. Go back into the classroom and tell James to
get back into his desk, and we begin with math. Oops
..I remembered
the oats spitter! An apology was given and accepted.
11:45
am - Time for lunch. Shawn is missing his scarf and James is talking
like a baby. Big mistake. I ask Bobby for his agenda book so that
I can let his mom know what happened to his face (they don't have
a phone). His book is covered with ravioli and his lunch covers
the bottom of his backpack. Bobby cleans everything up and we go
to the staff room to round up some lunch for him.
12:30
pm - Talk to the speech therapist about Kelly's language assessment.
It's not quite done yet, so we make an appointment to meet next
Tuesday at lunch. Discuss Charlie and Matthew with the intensive
speech therapist.
12:45
pm - Again record points for being on time, read our story, and
then head to the library. Remind Bobby and Charlie they can't borrow
books until they return their overdue books. Ask James to walk with
me so he is not mauling others. Dear time - everyone is reading.
Books on "Space" have caught Bobby's attention.
2:15
pm - Recess time again. No one has lost anything, but Kelly's ski
pants have self-destructed. Three safety pins later, off she goes.
2:30
pm - Great! No playground issues to deal with - they hate losing
50 points. We're making valentine pop-up cards. The messages the
kids come up with are really sweet. The kids are helping each other
so nicely that I give them all bonus points. Bailey makes a frog
card with a big mouth instead of a valentine. Check agenda books
and record points for the afternoon. Send Chris to the office to
talk about our book sale over the intercom.
3:30
pm - Bobby and Kirstin stay to arrange and finish pricing the books
for the sale. I plan for tomorrow. Between the book sale and the
dance, I probably won't get a lot done. Kevin's grandma comes in
to tell me he will be back tomorrow and "Could I please have
some work so he won't be behind when he returns?" Good news
- he doesn't have mono!!
4:30
pm - Head of to home. Stop to buy valentines. Darn - I forgot to
write on the plus side of Bobby's agenda book. Maybe his mom will
come into complain
..I have been trying to get her to come
in and talk about Bobby since November.
Chapter
4
University-Based
Researchers' Interpretations of the Meaning of Stories
Experiencing
Responsibility - David Friesen
As
I read these two stories, I cannot help but think about the responsibility
that teachers have for their students. Often we think of the responsibility
of teachers as the obligation they have by virtue of their teaching
role. This includes an obligation to follow the prescribed curriculum
and to enforce the rules and norms of the school. It is an obligation
shaped by the expectations of society over a long period of time.
This kind of obligation suggests a certain fixed teacher identity
that is common to most of our experiences of school - the teacher
as authority and transmitter of knowledge.
The
two stories presented here reveal the lived experience of these
teachers in relation to their students and show us another side
of responsibility - the teacher's ability to respond to situations
and in ways that are not always thought of as the primary focus
of teaching. For me, the stories raise the issue of pedagogical
responsibility for at risk students. Several questions guide this
inquiry into these teachers' stories. Does working with at risk
students demand a unique kind of response? Do these stories reveal
what that response might be?
Max
van Manen suggests in his book, The Tact of Teaching, that
pedagogy has to do with the being and becoming of the student. In
classrooms where students are more like, than unlike, the teacher
in terms of culture, socioeconomic status, and language, students
are encountered in a familiar and taken-for-granted way. In classrooms
where there are a number of at risk students, teachers are confronted
with the "otherness" of the students which demands a response.
In Mary's words, "I guess the key is to meet them where they
are and do what you can to take them beyond." She does not
lose sight of her intentions for them, such as preparing for the
science fair, but is aware that several students have personal problems
that need to be addressed as ends in themselves. Others have specific
learning problems that require modified programs to accommodate
them. The pedagogical responsibility reflected in these stories
involves taking students at "face value" and going on
from there.
Another
aspect of the pedagogical responsiveness to at risk students is
revealed in the involvement of others in meeting the needs of these
students. In Anna's story, she mentions the community coordinator
as a significant "other" in the search for the missing
student. School staffs, principals, speech therapists, police, a
grandma, and specific colleagues (including student teachers from
the university) are all mentioned as influences on students with
difficulties. Perhaps this community response is specific to the
pedagogical relationship with at risk students. Although teachers
are under pressure- in the words of Mary, "The key is to be
prepared for whatever happens" - there appears to be the realization
that a community approach has a better chance for success than the
individual attempts of a teacher. At risk students are not some
teacher's "discipline problems", they are children with
specific needs that require the attention of the community. Parents
and guardians are part of that community. Sometimes helpful, sometimes
not, nevertheless, these teachers recognize the need for their involvement.
Finally,
the stories reveal the teacher's ability to deal with difficulty
in teaching. This may be the most important aspect of pedagogical
responsibility to at risk students. There is a certain difficulty
that pedagogy in this kind of situation demands. In both these stories,
there is a relentless string of issues and problems to deal with.
As opposed to being overwhelmed by the rapidity and unpredictability
of classroom life, both Anna and Mary seem to be able to respond
to this by living with the difficulties. A celebration of a colleague's
birthday, buying valentines, and interaction with other staff members
at coffee and lunch all help them to cope with teaching situations
described by Mary as "where there are a multitude of things
going on." This living with difficulty appears to shape some
teachers into those who are able to respond to at risk students.
These teachers demonstrate responsibility in a different way; not
only for curriculum in an individualistic way, but to at risk children
in a collaborative way.
The
Student-Centred Teacher: Mary's Story - Sandra Finney
What
does it mean to be a student-centred teacher of vulnerable students?
To me Mary's story illustrates that as a teacher one consistently
views life from the students' perspective in order to understand
them better and see them in the most positive light. Concern for
the welfare of others in Mary's work life means that she is constantly
seeking to understand what others might need so that they can experience
some success or happiness, whether the "others" are preinterns
or her own students. How much thoughtfulness is captured in her
to the first student she met in her day! "Brian was waiting
in the hall already, so I gave him a couple of jobs to do in the
classroom so he wasn't just hanging around. He was happy to have
something to do and not to have to wait outside in the cold."
Later, Mary comments, "I returned to my room to discover three
more kids 'helping' Brian. I guess it's too cold and they aren't
dressed properly for it." It is clear that Mary makes a habit
of seeing things from the students' perspective because such responses
are not mandated by the profession, they come from personal conviction
about what a good teacher is and does.
As
I read through Mary's story several times, I began to note all the
ways that Mary shows concern for the welfare of those for whom she
is responsible. I found 11 different categories of concerned actions
and, as the thread running through them all, her ability to stop
and think about the underlying causes for behavior and about the
feelings and needs of others. Clearly, the centre of her concern
lies outside herself. Throughout the course of the day, Mary showed
concern for creating stability in her students' school life, for
their physical comfort, for their feelings, and for the best ways
to provide them with opportunities to experience success both academically
in the school and in their problems at home.
She
consistently maintains a positive perspective on their less-than-perfect
behaviors. For example, in explaining the unruliness of her students,
she says, "the lesson was not structured enough with predictable
steps. As a result, the students were overwhelmed by the concept."
Another may have thought the students were simply disinterested
or inconsiderate. Later, she comments about the last period of the
day, "The kids are not cooperating. They're tired and don't
feel like working anymore." Here is a teacher who sees her
students as persons with feelings and needs and rights.
Mary's
personal definition of the student-centred teacher of vulnerable
students seems to be captured in her concluding remarks, "But
who can predict their reaction? I guess the key is to meet them
where they are and do what you can to take them beyond." She
is neither content to leave students at their present level of skills
and abilities nor to ignore their unique backgrounds and the personal
and social problems which they continuously face. If we listen for
ways that Mary responds to difficult situations, we can learn a
lot from her story of a day in the life of a high-risk classroom.
No matter how restricted or troubled our particular life situations,
one always has choices about how to respond. I can't help feeling
that if every teacher responded to her of his students with the
considerateness and firm but positive regard that Mary shows, more
vulnerable students would see school as a place where they belong
and are needed.
At
the Centre of Many Lives: Anna's Story - Sandra Finney
All
teachers affect many lives. By their words and actions they have
the power to help or hurt, to support or work against the dreams
and struggles of students and their families. This power takes on
a particular significance with students who face a myriad of social
and economic barriers. The vulnerability of such students and families
in relation to persons in positions of authority is heightened.
In times of crisis, the teacher's actions may make the difference
between students' discouragement and despair or determination to
remain in the struggle for a better education and a better life.
How are teachers affected by the weight of such responsibility?
How does the frailty of family stability and the knowledge that
many of the students' problems have social and economic origins
influence a teacher's actions and outlook? How do teachers who work
in schools in low-income neighborhoods maintain their faith in children's
abilities and resilience, keep some level of emotional balance,
and respond with compassion to the magnitude of problems and to
the constant demands on their time, energy, and abilities?
In
answering such questions, Anna's story of a day in her life as a
teacher of vulnerable students has much to offer. To begin, we learn
that even during her early morning shower, Anna is focused on her
students and their needs. Mental reminder number one is for the
welfare of a new student which involves alerting the community school
coordinator of the situation. Mental reminder number two involves
the well being of Anna's staff as she "makes sure the coffee
is being made." This far, Anna's image emerges as a caring
teacher who is at the hub of a network of people, all who depend
on her to remain faithful to her personal commitments. I say personal
commitments rather than professional responsibilities
because each of Anna's actions, to this point, have involved a choice
to either take the extra step, which may be needed but is not clear
cut nor mandatory, or to let it go and hope someone else will step
in or that the situation will resolve itself. Throughout the day,
Anna appears to make that extra effort which might tip the balance
between discouragement or hope. It strikes me that it is through
such small acts of care that Anna maintain her identity as a good
teacher.
During
the first hours of the school day, it becomes clearer that Anna
is indeed at the centre of relationships among the students in her
classroom and also a web of other people which includes parents,
parent volunteers, students from other classes, and other staff
members. Anna coordinates the relationships among these children
and adults by drawing from a great deal of information about their
experiences and abilities, their likes and dislikes, and common
and uncommon behaviors, while continuing to mind the daily timetable
and other home-and-school events. For example, "kids come to
the door to explain their class's Project Love fund raiser. Send
students out into the hall in pairs to read to parent volunteer."
Later, Anna's recess break begins with a call to the staff room
to celebrate a staff member's birthday and ends with a succession
of problems demanding her attention such as, "playground supervisor
tells me that Charlie has had problems on the playground, perhaps
we could discuss it during lunch" and "Tim, our assistant,
is fuming because Charlie hit him with a snowball." Clearly,
the teacher is at the centre of these types of concerns - she is
the person to turn to when things go wrong.
As
the day progresses, Anna addresses each situation that arises, turning
no one away without some support or assistance. Bobby gets help
cleaning up the ravioli which covers the bottom of his backpack
and finding a substitute lunch; a check is made on Kelly's language
assessment and her ripped ski pants are mended with three safety
pins and a teacher's care. Despite the constancy of the problems
and interruptions, Anna continues the day with humor and a positive
regard for her students. She has experimented with many ways to
help students maintain a positive classroom atmosphere and has found
that a point system with whole-class rewards appears to be working
well with this particular group. "Great - no playground issues
to deal with - they hate losing 50 points. We're making valentine
pop-up cards. The messages the kids come up with are really sweet.
The kids are helping each other so nicely, I give them all bonus
points."
Anna's
day ends as it started - thinking about her students and their families,
reminding herself of things she needs to do and the contacts she
needs to make, and buying valentines for her students. At the centre
of many lives is a teacher who cares to remember students' needs,
to take the time to bring students, families, and supportive resources
together, and to search for alternative management systems and finds,
in each of these acts, that the act is its own reward.
I
close with the thought that those who can support teachers of vulnerable
students could perhaps find more and better ways to support, if
they, too, retained an image of these teachers as at the centre
of many lives. To me it is important to visualize all the students
and their families who are dependent on these teachers for understanding
- that extra small act of kindness which can make the difference
between hope and despair. When we support teachers with our consideration
and kindness, we are helping them build the reserves they need to
continue their support of others within their web of care.
Mary's
Story: What Might a Parent Say? - Caroline Krentz
As
I reflect on this teacher's day, I feel overwhelmed by the intensity
of the context as well as the time demands. Her day begins with
a very early start, to ensure that the day will go smoothly, and
progresses on into the evening hours with a Parent Advisory Council
meeting. This teacher lives intense days. I can only hope there
are days that are somewhat shorter in length and less demanding.
In
this story, the teacher's role encompasses responsibility at several
levels: classroom, school, and community. The classroom responsibilities
seem to predominate. Most of the story describes individual student
needs, subject-area lessons, and student responses. I have the sense
that this teacher knows her students well and tries to anticipate
ways to ensure each individual's success in learning and social
interactions. She is aware these students appreciate routines that
set clear expectations. Her sensitivity allows her to set an appropriate
pace for a very cold winter day in a classroom. Her pleasure at
seeing her students completing their work gives her encouragement.
On the other hand, the teacher recognizes that some students need
individual guidance and support. She has the patience to wait for
an angry student to calm down and rejoin the class.
From
a parent's perspective, this teacher seems very committed to each
student's success. She speaks with concern when an individual moves
outside the group norms. At day's end, she reviews events and behavior
to conclude that the class has had an excellent day, in spite of
interruptions and visitors. Her energy and hopeful viewpoint certainly
encourage a parent's sense that the classroom experience this teacher
provides is a positive one for students.
I
also note that this teacher carries responsibilities beyond her
classroom. Planning a school dance and coaching basketball involve
her in whole-school activities. In addition, she seems to be a staff
representative on the Parent Advisory Council. Commitment to the
life of the school seems to be part of the teacher's professional
contribution. These extracurricular activities would assure parents
that this professional is very supportive of school life and the
wider community.
Beyond
the classroom and school commitments, this teacher is making a professional
contribution to future teachers. She has volunteered to have preinterns
in her classroom. In this way, she is prepared to share her professional
knowledge with two novices. The early arrival at school to ensure
that all is ready for the preinterns, speaks to her careful consideration
of how the day will evolve. At the same time, she is sensitive to
other possibilities and tries to provide adequate background information
for the preinterns. She is concerned that they and her students
have a positive experience. Through her leadership, this teacher
is exhibiting a commitment to her professional community.
Professional
commitment at the classroom, school, and community levels assures
a parent that the teacher is a person who is willing to give her
time and experience to learners. She seems to be setting an example
of what is possible, even in a high-risk context.
Anna's
Story: What a Parent Might Respond? - Caroline Krentz
From
a parent's perspective, this is a long, busy day! Three themes seem
to focus the teacher's attention - concern for individual students,
teaching subject content, and encouraging a positive social climate.
Throughout the day, these themes intermingle to influence the teacher's
actions and decisions. The day begins and ends with thoughts about
students. In the intervening 10 hours, the teacher is occupied with
teaching, mediating, and professional interactions.
Concern
for individual students seems to surface as soon as the teacher
begins her day at home. She wonders whether a new student, absent
for half of 10 days, will return. At school she continues her search
for information about the student with the community coordinator.
During the morning she attends to other students' needs - a missing
pencil, a lost book, and playground altercations. The lunch hour
is filled with helping find a scarf and a lunch for a student. She
spends time discussing the language and speech needs of three students
with the speech therapist. After lunch, the teacher ensures that
one student gets to the library without any incident. She recognizes
the cooperation and positive behavior of all the students when they
make valentine pop-up cards. Students help with the preparations
for the book sale. She celebrates when she hears that a student
is returning after an illness.
This
teacher seems to see students as individuals who need support and
positive attention. She seems aware of the diverse personalities
and behaviors in the group. Her day is filled with many teaching
and group activities. I'm reminded of the image of a juggler who
keeps all the balls moving in a pattern.
The
timetable plan for the day provides the framework for the teachers'
juggling individual concerns with teaching and the social context.
Subject areas - including spelling, social studies, mathematics,
reading, and art - represent the school curriculum. The teacher
has planned lessons to provide particular experiences and activities
for her students. Teaching, for her, seems to involve subject content
as well as social context.
The
third theme, the positive social climate, pervades the story of
the teacher's day. She consciously acknowledges the challenges of
living with demanding individuals but plans the day, and her responses,
in a way that acknowledges the needs of all group members. Points
for being on time, bonus points for helping each other, and a class
project to raise money for Project Love reflect a plan that supports
each student while encouraging positive relationships and mutual
respect.
This
teacher exudes an optimistic outlook. She deftly juggles individual
concerns, subject content, and group encouragement. Her realistic,
practical approach is revealed in her decision to limit her teaching
plans for the next day because it will include both a book sale
and dance. When she realizes she has forgotten to write a note to
a student's mother, the teacher considers the possibility that his
mother might come to the school to discuss her son's progress. From
a parent's perspective, I believe that a teacher who can see the
bright side at the end of a demanding, but probably typical, day
is a person who is committed to students and works diligently to
meet the academic, personal, and social needs of students.
Chapter
5
Responses
to the Stories and their Interpretations by Teacher Members of the
Network
By
Teacher Members of the Network
Responding
to Mary's Story - Terri Mayne
I
found each of the responses to Mary's story to be quite affirming
- affirming the teacher's approach, her involvement, and her attitude.
Teachers, despite best intentions and efforts, end up working in
isolation. For five hours each day, we are alone with out students.
We attempt to assist these students to grow and to develop as individuals.
Through it all, however, we seldom receive feedback as to our success
or lack thereof. We must operate on what we feel is the "right"
thing to do. In reading and reflecting on each of the three interpretations
of this teacher's day, I was struck by a sense of affirmation, by
a sense of "Yes! Maybe what I am doing is having an impact
as well."
Through
experience, I have developed a sense of what works and what does
not work; however, what I am missing is how it touches students.
I have always believed that the most fundamental role I have is
to help build or, at the very least, maintain each child's self-concept.
By doing this, I can create a closer working relationship and an
atmosphere of trust. Partly, I can accomplish this by developing
a personal relationship with my students and by understanding and
respecting their feelings, what motivates them, and what they like
and dislike. As well, by consistently maintaining high expectations
and assisting students to attain them, I help to build confidence
in their own abilities.
What
has been noted several instances is this teacher's positive approach.
I believe this to be a key to successful teaching. Students do not
make us angry. Students simply provide the impetus for our anger.
It is we alone who determine our response. We choose to have a good
day or a bad day. I believe that I choose to have a good day.
Caroline
notes that "students appreciate routines that set clear expectations."
It is through the predictable expectations that students feel a
sense of security. I also believe that the expectations provide
"teachable moments." Students must see life as a series
of choices and consequences. They are responsible for what they
do. They are a product of their choices. They must be taught how
to evaluate the consequences of the choices they make. In doing
so, they begin to see how they do have control over their lives.
I believe that this is particularly important for at risk students
who often feel so helpless because of economic, social, or learning
problems. If they can see that there are areas in their lives over
which they can choose a course of action, this understanding may
begin to permeate other areas as well.
I
love my job and therefore spend a lot of time planning and preparing
for it. My daybook is always written in because thorough planning
is a key to successful instruction. As well, use of the curriculum
guides, which are quite excellent, is an integral part of the planning
process. However, I am not a slave to the curriculum. I believe
that I must assess the skills that students possess and plan what
they need, whether or not it fits in with the curriculum.
In
David's reflection on this teacher's story, he addressed the way
in which programming is accomplished for specific students. Morphographic
Spelling, Skills for School Success, and Decode Reading C
are all examples of programs that are in place to address students'
learning needs. I also attempt to program for students' needs. At
risk students often come to school with learning gaps. It is my
job to assess students and determine the level at which they are
functioning. Then, I put into place appropriate programming. This
may be grade and curriculum appropriate, or it may not be. These
things are determined solely by the student's level.
Overall,
I think that the three interpretations of this teacher's day agree
with my own sense of her practice. However, I believe that every
teaching situation has its own set of challenges. I believe the
true measure of success is the ability to identify these challenges
as they arise and to know how to address them.
"A
Day in the Life" of an Elementary School Teacher: Anna's Story
- Terri Mayne
Teaching
is becoming a complex endeavor. Teachers are asked to assume an
ever-increasing number of roles. They must deal with many nonacademic
issues. These two things are particularly evident in this teacher's
classroom. Her interactions with students are calm and brimming
with acceptance and understanding. She accepts students for who
they are.
I
think the first thing that strikes me in this account is the sheer
number of roles this teacher must play. She begins her day as a
normal person, showering. However, she quickly slips into the role
of a social worker who is concerned about a child's lack of attendance.
Next, she assumes the role of communication coordinator in planning
her discussions with the community coordinator. After that, she
is a caregiver by being concerned with staff members and making
coffee for them. As her day continues, she moves form a counselor,
to a merchant, to a police officer, to a mediator, to a caretaker,
to a cheerleader and, in between everything, she still manages to
teach.
I
am struck by the multiplicity of roles this teacher plays and the
ease with which she moves between them. Society is demanding more
and more from teachers. We are asked to "pick up the slack"
where there are no others. This teacher accepts these roles willingly
and moves easily and naturally between them.
The
next thing that strikes me is the sheer quantity of nonacademic
issues which face this teacher. Attendance, making coffee, missing
pencils and books, missing boots, behavior problems, broken ski
pants, and the Project Love book sale. Somehow this teacher manages
to teach around it all. While her primary task is to teach, she
remains concerned by the other small (and maybe not so small) things
that affect the lives of her students.
I
am also struck by the teacher's calmness throughout her busy day.
I think it would truly be a comfort to be in this person's classroom.
Students who lead incredibly tumultuous lives outside school receive
comfort and a sense of security in this teacher's room. Shawn, the
little boy who can't find his boots, is simply redirected back to
the boot rack where they are found. When Charlie has been in a fight
on the playground, she discusses the situation and handles it with
calmness and caring.
Relationships
also dominate. This teacher understands, knows, and accepts her
students where they are. She hopes that her missing child will be
back in school. James, who makes strange noises is accepted and
gently guided toward more appropriate behavior. Charlie, who has
thrown handcuffs at another student, is dealt with in a kind and
gentle way.
I
believe her students are fortunate to have a teacher such as she.
She assumes whatever role is necessary for the situation. She deals
with whatever issues arise in a calm and caring manner. She accepts
students for who they are. She is obviously a committed professional
who, in spite of all the day's happenings, manages to "sneak"
teaching into the lives of many troubled children.
A
Teacher's Response to Interpretations - Sandra Garratt
After
reading the two stories and the three interpretations, I realized
why I often am very tired by Friday. Reading the stories also reminded
me that, as teachers, we must not forget the needs of those children
who sit quietly and do not demand our attention. They are easily
overlooked in the hustle and bustle of our busy days.
All
the interpretations speak of putting the child ahead of the curriculum.
Very little progress will be made in the classroom where the needs
of the students are not attended to. Children who are afraid, are
hungry, or who do not feel valued and respected, have more difficulty
with learning than children whose needs are being met. We must try
to provide a calm and caring classroom when we are dealing with
children in crisis but, at the same time, we must not forget that
our primary purpose is to help children attain skills in language
arts, math, and so on. Usually, learning is not effective until
the students see the classroom as a safe place. It is our job to
create an atmosphere where the children feel safe, where each student
feels valued and where the expectations for each student are appropriate
for that student. Only then can learning take place. A positive
social climate is crucial to creating a safe environment in the
classroom. I have to keep reminding myself that I cannot control
what happens to my kids outside the school, but I can have an impact
on what happens inside the school.
Making
use of services provided by the community, such as grandmas, community
workers, social workers, and other teachers enhances one's own activities.
Collaboration with others gives you the opportunity to see the other
side of the issues and, as well, provides a sounding board for different
ideas and approaches to issues. Getting involved with other agencies
can make positive things happen for your students.
Keeping
a positive but realistic outlook is necessary if we are to survive
in the classroom. Maintaining high expectations for our students
is important but so, too, is accepting that not all our expectations
will be met. Seeking support from our peers, as well as providing
support, is important in dealing with the stress that is an everyday
part of our lives. Being flexible is vital. Some days just don't
go as planned. That fabulous lesson you planned just didn't work.
Being flexible means learning from mistakes and being willing to
reroute your day to best meet the needs of your students. Being
flexible means setting aside your plans for math that day, to capitalize
on something unexpected, for example, a learning session on the
frogs that had been caught by some boys on the way to school. It
also means that we must remember to include that math skill during
another lesson.
Retaining
a positive outlook in the face of the many daily challenges when
teaching children who are at risk is difficult but necessary. We
must celebrate the small milestones with gusto, looking for the
small steps forward, and recognize the efforts that went into making
them. We must also be willing to accept that sometimes, no matter
how hard we try, no matter the accommodations we make to the curriculum,
no matter how much sweat and tears we put into our efforts, we will
not succeed with all our students. This doesn't mean that we stop
trying to help these individuals, it just means that we shouldn't
whip ourselves because we are unable to change the world.
It
is important to try to maintain the fundamental focus of the classroom
which, in the primary classroom, is the attainment of skills. We
must try to balance the teaching of social skills with the teaching
of language and math skills. All are important. I would agree that
teaching involves a juggling act. Sometimes we drop the ball but
we have to pick it up and continue. We are involved in very important
work - the development of children.
Hope
this is helpful to our project. I didn't realize that I held such
strong views until I started writing this. I think that having verbalized
my thoughts will help me in my classroom .
A
Teacher's Thoughts on the Stories and Interpretations - Dianne
Stark
While
reading this material over the summer, I came to realize why I am
so tired by Friday and why I sleep through the first two weeks of
July. The stories reminded me of a day in my classroom. The interpretations
made me feel very good about what I do, how my actions affect the
children I work with, and that my work is recognized by some. I
feel the interpretations are very valid; I agree with them.
The
university-based interpretations of the two stories made me reflect
on my teaching practices and, although I didn't gain any new insights.
I thought about teaching in a different light. In reading the stories
and interpretations, I felt reassured because my school days don't
differ much from those presented. It was also apparent how teachers
take negative situations and/ or experiences and see them in a positive
way. The recognition that little things have to be celebrated was
acknowledged, even if it meant that things hadn't really gone the
way you had wished initially. If teachers don't do this on a daily
basis, we would become ineffective as classroom teachers.
I
have always realized the number of hats I wear in the classroom.
The stories really emphasized this and, like always, we hope we
make the right decision in dealing with some of the sensitive issues
that arise. We know that children can't concentrate on learning
if something is bothering them. Teachers have to handle so many
situations - most of them almost immediately - and without the assistance
of another professional. We encourage children to talk to us and
ask for help, but are we qualified to deal with some of these disclosures?
Once the paper work has gone through the proper channels, the parental
permission is given, and so forth, many of these children have relocated
and their problems are no closer to being dealt with. As I reflect
on my day at school, these situations present themselves over and
over, and I wonder if my heart has told me the right thing to do.
Communication
was evident in both stories and it is vital to make things happen
and not just at school. It was clear that teachers are divided so
many ways during the day and can only plan one day at a time. We
need to talk to each other, to support staff, and to parents to
stay on top of things. Just as we need to be sensitive to the needs
of the children in our school, we need to be sensitive to the needs
of our colleagues and ourselves. Sometimes we get so wrapped up
in our classroom that we tend to forget to make time for this.
Curriculum
instruction is what we are trained to do and we feel safe with it.
It is very important but not at the expense of losing students along
the way, for whatever reason. I remember my first teaching job,
trying to teach everything for the grade level and using all the
approved materials. When I talked to my principal after he observed
in my classroom, I felt I had to say something about the materials
not relating at all the lifestyle or experiences of the children
I was teaching. What a relief!!!
he told me to forget the materials
and teach the children!! It is wonderful to see that teachers are
doing this and feel safe enough to share it.
I
haven't been successful in using whole-group rewards on a regular
basis. I have to come to terms with what it is I hope to accomplish
with the rewards. Will such rewards effect long-term change? For
example, would the children strive for self-improvement or work
together to accomplish something? These would result in carryover
and a sense of pride. Or, would the children work for the rewards
just to receive them? To me, this is bribery. What should the rewards
be? In my room the rewards are given more on an individual basis,
with the children receiving a lot of praise, stickers, bookmarks,
and son on. Once in a while we have game days where everyone gets
to participate. I know teachers do whatever they think is best for
their students and many teachers do run excellent reward programs.
I guess I'm not sold on it yet; I have to do what I feel comfortable
with.
The
one really important thing I saw in the stories was how much our
days are dictated by the few demanding students in our classes.
Yes, they require our care and attention but not at the expense
of the rest of the class. It requires a special effort, everyday,
to ensure that you recognize even the quietest of the students and
let them know they are just as important as the others. This is
an area that all teachers have to address and one that I will continue
to work on.
A
Day in the Life of a Teacher of at Risk Students: Another Teacher's
Response - Brenda Martin
As
a teacher of at risk and special-needs students, I found myself
nodding affirmatively while reading through the stories written
by these teachers, recognizing many of my own teaching days mirrored
in their practice. I particularly related to the constant streams
of thought that ran through each teacher's mind - about the individual
children in the classroom and their unique personal stories; about
the need to meet with various members of the school-based support
staff; about the impact of the family dynamics created by specific
members of student's families; about the adaptations made to lessons
to ensure student success; about the changes taking place in the
original plan to better meet the needs of the students that day;
about the absolute necessity of living with some things that aren't
that important in the big picture and letting go of other things
one is powerless to change; about both student and teacher successes
that must be noted and celebrated at the moment of achievement -
the never-ending process of mental problem solving that often takes
place while we are physically engaged in our daily routines.
As
I read both the stories and their interpretations, a very specific
and distinct portrait of an effective teacher of at risk students
emerged. This teacher interacts naturally with others in a caring
and positive manner, always seeking to find what motivates others'
behavior to better understand them and, where possible and appropriate,
meet their needs. This teacher is one who can see and celebrate
success in progress, shrug off disappointments and setbacks, and
remain eternally optimistic about what tomorrow may bring. As teamwork
is an essential part of the effective instruction of at risk students,
this teacher is one who can communicate clearly on behalf of students
and can accept advice, suggestions, and support from the school-based
staff of specialists, thus becoming empowered with both professional
and personal strength (given that the specialists on staff are proficient
and supportive in their role). The skilled teacher of at risk students
is also one who is a creative problem solver, ever seeking alternate
ways of doing things, whether it is in teaching a lesson, managing
student behavior, arranging communicatin with families, or maintaining
a positive classroom atmosphere. Adaptability is the key. Unpredictability
prevails in these classrooms and the teacher is always prepared
to relinquish the original plan and create a new one within moments.
Within that readiness to change, however, is an inherent sense of
structure; many of the children in these classrooms come from somewhat
chaotic homes and they seem to thrive on and derive a sense of comfort
and trust from being in an environment that is predictable with
a sense of routine.
When
I read the university-based interpretations of the stories, I was
struck by the contrast in my own response to the written material.
Mostly, I heard and felt the overwhelming intensity of the teachers'
days as perceived by others and recognized more clearly how influential
a good teacher of at risk students can be. The analogy which depicted
the teacher at the centre of a web of influence is one that stayed
with me, as it is a powerful image of the role that the teacher
of at risk students plays. In addition, it served as a visual reminder
that, by its very nature, a web is indeed a fragile thing, requiring
ongoing support if it is to maintain its effectiveness. No teacher,
no matter how effective, has a limitless reserve of time, energy,
and emotional strength. Indeed, I affirm the notion that "when
we support teachers with our consideration and kindness, we are
helping them build the reserves they need to continue their support
of others within their web of care." I would add that "charity
starts at home" and that we, as teachers, could begin by recognizing
and supporting the work of our own colleagues who toil in classrooms
like these, everyday. When we can communicate the reality of our
experiences in working with the at risk children in our classrooms
and can demonstrate that we are valued by the members of our profession
for the work we do, then we invite others outside our immediate
circle - our administrators, our board members, our government departments,
our extended social and business communities - to join with us in
creating support and building reserves for teachers who wake up
on the "web" every day.
Chapter
6
Closing
Thoughts
S.
Finney, D. Friesen, C. Krentz
Reading
over the transcripts from a half-day meeting of the network, we
were struck by the following statement of one of the teachers:
I
have always worked in the inner city or special education or whatever,
and it is what I like doing. But every now and then I can't carry
the load?
What
is it about teaching, especially g at risk students that makes the
load hard to carry? Why do teachers, and others, believe that they
alone have to carry the load?
The
teachers' voices heard through the transcripts speak again and again
about the lack of time to tend to the needs of the children. They
talk about the apparent lack of communication among agencies that
should be cooperatively involved in supporting these at risk children.
These teachers remind us about the lack of support for their work
in the front lines of the battle to provide at risk children with
equal educational opportunities. They often feel that they alone
must bear the responsibility not only for the safety and well being
of their students, but also for the involvement of the students'
families in the education of their children. These teachers know
that the connection of the school to the community is vital to their
work. The work of teachers of at risk students extends beyond the
classroom into the community. In short, they exude a teacher identity
that has at its core advocacy for children.
If
there is one benefit from the time spent together in the network
sharing stories of practice, it is the realization by these teachers
that the load they bear is being shared by other teachers who understand
and care. During the meetings over the year, the teachers did not
produce checklist of "best practices" - although these
did surface - but rather they developed a community of mutual support
for their work.
If
there is one belief we have developed, it is that teachers involved
with at risk students need to have a sense of hope. The gains and
rewards of this kind of teaching come slowly. There are few miracles.
Teachers need to take heart from one another to carry on. While
a sense of hope is implicit in the stories of these teachers' daily
lives, it gains greater strength as the stories are shared. We believe
that the bleak social odds of many children are overcome in the
community.
References
Aoki,
T. (Ed.), (1990). Voices of Teaching. Monograph 1. Vancouver,
BC: British Columbia Teachers' Federation.
Bruner,
J., (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Carson,
T., (1986). Closing the gap between research and practice: conversation
as a mode of research. Phenomenology and Pedagogy, 4(2),
73-85.
Clandinin,
D.J., & Connelly, F.M., (1994). Personal experience methods.
In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative
methods (pp. 413-427). San Francisco: Sage.
Florio-Ruane,
S., (1991). Conversation and narrative in collaborative research:
An ethnography of the written literary form. In C. Witherall &
N. Noddings (Eds.), Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue
in education (pp. 234-256). New York: Teachers College Press.
Friesen,
D.W., (1996). Towards educative community: Pushing the borders of
student teaching. Journal of Professional Studies, 3(2),
15-24.
Gadamer,
H.G., (1988). The hermeneutics of suspicion. In G. Shapiro &
A. Sica (Eds.), Hermeneutics: Questions and prospects (pp.
54-65). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Gudmundsdottir,
S., (1991). Story-maker, story-teller: Narrative structures in curriculum.
Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(3), 207-218.
Polkinghorne,
D.E., (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany,
NY: State University of New York Press.
|